- Ben Glaser (Yale University), Ian Cornelius (Yale University)
What happens when a poet takes a foreign meter as a model? Is it possible to “translate” prosody? If so, how does this happen? How does the act of prosodic translation select and create equivalences between one prosodic system and another? What deformations, transformation, or innovations result from this process? Why do poets undertake these experiments in interlingual crossing? What is it about the space between phonologies and between national metrical traditions that draws poets to adopt metrical models from languages other than their own? What kinds of readership or audience do these prosodically hybrid compositions anticipate, presuppose, or construct? Do foreign models depend on recognition, or do they serve poets and poetic traditions in a more structural way (for instance, as resources for counterpointing and dissonance)? Finally, to what extent are foreign models and the study of prosody (i.e. scansion) mutually dependent or destabilizing?
This panel invites scholars of any period and poetic tradition to suggest new ways of scanning and interpreting translated prosody. Although we are primarily interested in inter-linguistic crossings, we will also consider paper proposals which think about crossings between traditions and tendencies within a single language (e.g., returns of the Alexandrine in vers libre; alliteration in accentual-syllabic English verse; the development of accentual Latin verse forms in the Middle Ages). We also welcome studies of actual translation, both historical and contemporary. We are especially interested in papers founded in efforts—however tentative—at scansion of these chimeras.
SEMINAR KEYWORDS: poetry, poetics, versification, translation, meter, rhythm, prosody, scansion, linguistics,