Organizer: Niia Bishop
Contact the Seminar OrganizersThis seminar invites papers critically exploring whiteness as an invented political and social identity category. We seek to investigate its emergence from the transatlantic slave trade, its persistence as an entrenched social norm, and its relative stasis compared to evolving terminology for other racial identities.
Central to our inquiry: Why do people who believe themselves to be white still invest in this category? What strategies might facilitate evolution beyond whiteness? As other racial designations have transformed—Black/Negro/Colored to African-American, Hispanic to Latin/x, Indian to Native/Indigenous, Oriental to Asian—we pose the crucial question: What does Post-Whiteness look like?
We encourage submissions examining:
Historical and ideological foundations of whiteness, including contributions of figures like François Bernier and Johann Friedrich Blumenbach to "Caucasian" classification.
Whiteness as a reactionary force, particularly in opposition to Blackness and other identities.
Contradictions between whiteness and moral frameworks, such as Christianity.
Possibilities for transcending, rejecting, or abandoning whiteness, and the stakes involved.
We welcome papers engaging with key concepts in critical whiteness studies, including:
Robin DiAngelo's "white fragility" and white racial socialization
Eduardo Bonilla-Silva's color-blind racism and social construction of whiteness
David Roediger's historical perspective on whiteness in the US
Ruth Frankenberg's intersectional approaches to whiteness and gender
George Lipsitz's "possessive investment in whiteness"
Peggy McIntosh's exploration of white privilege
Charles Mills' examination of whiteness through social contract theory
Research probing the complexities of whiteness from sociological, historical, philosophical, and cultural perspectives is encouraged. We particularly welcome explorations of potential pathways beyond whiteness and the societal implications of such evolution.
Goals:
Explore historical and political origins of whiteness and its enduring influence
Question whiteness's evolution (or lack thereof) compared to other racial identities
Examine potential for transcending whiteness and its implications
Investigate intersections between whiteness and moral/ethical frameworks
Analyze whiteness as a social construct in identity, privilege, and systemic racism
Envision possibilities for Post-Whiteness and strategies to facilitate this transition
Structure:
Three sessions, up to 12 panelists, 20-minute papers with discussion.
Submission:
Faculty and graduate students welcome. Submit a 250-word abstract and brief bio by the deadline.
Central to our inquiry: Why do people who believe themselves to be white still invest in this category? What strategies might facilitate evolution beyond whiteness? As other racial designations have transformed—Black/Negro/Colored to African-American, Hispanic to Latin/x, Indian to Native/Indigenous, Oriental to Asian—we pose the crucial question: What does Post-Whiteness look like?
We encourage submissions examining:
Historical and ideological foundations of whiteness, including contributions of figures like François Bernier and Johann Friedrich Blumenbach to "Caucasian" classification.
Whiteness as a reactionary force, particularly in opposition to Blackness and other identities.
Contradictions between whiteness and moral frameworks, such as Christianity.
Possibilities for transcending, rejecting, or abandoning whiteness, and the stakes involved.
We welcome papers engaging with key concepts in critical whiteness studies, including:
Robin DiAngelo's "white fragility" and white racial socialization
Eduardo Bonilla-Silva's color-blind racism and social construction of whiteness
David Roediger's historical perspective on whiteness in the US
Ruth Frankenberg's intersectional approaches to whiteness and gender
George Lipsitz's "possessive investment in whiteness"
Peggy McIntosh's exploration of white privilege
Charles Mills' examination of whiteness through social contract theory
Research probing the complexities of whiteness from sociological, historical, philosophical, and cultural perspectives is encouraged. We particularly welcome explorations of potential pathways beyond whiteness and the societal implications of such evolution.
Goals:
Explore historical and political origins of whiteness and its enduring influence
Question whiteness's evolution (or lack thereof) compared to other racial identities
Examine potential for transcending whiteness and its implications
Investigate intersections between whiteness and moral/ethical frameworks
Analyze whiteness as a social construct in identity, privilege, and systemic racism
Envision possibilities for Post-Whiteness and strategies to facilitate this transition
Structure:
Three sessions, up to 12 panelists, 20-minute papers with discussion.
Submission:
Faculty and graduate students welcome. Submit a 250-word abstract and brief bio by the deadline.